On Sep 1, 2015, at 9:37 AM, Steven Pattison (Kansas) <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
DISTRICT, is a certain portion of the country, separated from the rest for some special purposes. The United States are divided into judicial districts, in each of which is established a district court; they are also divided into election districts; collection districts, &c. – Source – PDF page 490 and document page 485 within Volume I – BOUVIER’S LAW DICTIONARY 1843 2nd Edition Volume I & Volume II Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year one thousand eight hundred and forty-three, BY JOHN BOUVIER
James Wilson of Pennsylvania said of oaths, “A good government did not need them and a bad one could not or ought not to be supported.” Internet search – In our opinion an oath was required so that if anyone did anything without delegated authority they could be held accountable for their actions.
When the First Congress met in New York City in March of 1789 and before the members of Congress could do anything, there was something more important they needed to do—so important that it was the first bill introduced in the House of Representatives, and the first act signed into law by President George Washington. The Oath of Office: The First Act of the First Congress:
“An Act to Regulate the Time and Manner of Administering Certain Oaths” was signed into law on June 1, 1789. It prescribed the text of and procedure for the administration of the oath of office.
The act mandated that the oath be administered in the following form: “I, A.B. do solemnly swear or affirm (as the case may be) that I will support the Constitution of the United States.” This simple, straightforward oath fulfilled the constitutional requirement outlined in Article VI, clause 3:
The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.
Article VI – This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding. – law.cornell.edu
What does “contrary notwithstanding” mean? “Notwithstanding any thing to the contrary” means that anything in the Constitution or laws of any State shall supersede and prevail over any thing contrary to this clause. Any thing that contradicts or withstands this clause shall be ineffective and inoperative qua this clause.
This was the reason for all the state Constitutions being changed! The new constitutions were for the newly formed districts under the Municipal Corporations which were all done without delegated authority under Roman Civil Law which is not laws of any kind but rules for servants. Every current state in our opinion had something as happened within Missouri which is posted here.
This is when we as “We the People” allowed the required Oath to be change to a loyalty Oath as covered within this webpage.
The act of congress of June 1, 1789, 1 Story’s L. U. S. p. 1, regulates the time and manner of administering certain oaths as follows:
§1. Be it enacted, &c., That the oath or affirmation required by the sixth article of the constitution of the United States, shall be administered in the form following, to wit, “I, A B, do solemnly swear or affirm, (as the case may be,) that I will support the constitution of the United States.” The said oath or affirmation shall be administered within three days after the passing of this act, by any one member of the senate, to the president of the senate, and by him to all the members, and to the secretary; and by the speaker of the house of representatives, to all the members who have not taken a similar oath, by virtue of a particular resolution of the said house, and to the clerk: and in case of the absence of any member from the service of either house, at the time prescribed for taking the said oath or affirmation, the same shall be administered to such member when he shall appear to take his seat.
It’s a big waste of time to go through life being unclear about what must be true. Steven Wayne Pattison – Internet search yielded 8,130 results
“Thinking without knowing the truth is a big waste of your time. Steven Wayne Pattison – Internet search yielded 827 results
“Sarah, if the American people knew the truth about what we Bushes have done to the nation, we would be chased down the street and lynched.” (George H.W. Bush to reporter Sarah McClendon, Dec. 1992) Internet search yielded only 64 results
Search First; search second about money; third one on scanned retina; fourth about The federal government, in collusion with the Supreme Court, have grossly misinterpreted the Necessary and Proper Clause and the Commerce Clause of the Constitution to usurp almost all of the powers delegated to the states into the federal government’s hands. – Internet search “DO WE HAVE A FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OR A NATIONAL GOVERNMENT?” ‘The History of our Country’and my home page. Cell (913) 461-1661 – Skype
/S/ Steven Wayne Pattison – Once I, Steven Wayne Pattison, was an “useful idiot too!”
From: Carl Swensson [mailto:email@example.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2015 4:48 PM
To: ‘ARNIE ROSNER’
Cc: Greg Todd; Jim Porter; Steven Pattison (Kansas); Susan Herbert; thomas deegan
Subject: Foreign agents all
Received loyalty Oaths from my county Commissioners and it is now apparent that they have verified they are citizens of the UNITED STATES and mere employees of Henry County.
As such, they admit to being “Resident Aliens”. This is further evidence of how the U.S. has State and local public servants under their direct control.
His Excellency, the Governor “Commissions” these and all other State imposters.
Do you find it at all curious that “His Excellency”, “Honorable”, His Eminence” and any number of other titles seem to have crept back into the language and allowed to stand unchallenged? Both military and oligarchy labels are thrown about with reckless abandon. “Elites” is a more common title assigned to the upper tiers of corporations and government alike.
May I suggest that you make it a habit of addressing any such public servants as “Servant Nathan Deal” in all future correspondence and when dealing with these fraudsters in public.