Federal and States Income Tax Code uniformity of elections and revocations thereof…..:)

On Mar 27, 2015, at 1:26 PM, secretariat@seagov.net wrote:

Breathren,

Voila_Capture 2015-03-27_04-13-45_PM

I’ve finally cracked the proverbial Federal & States Income Tax Code uniformity of elections & revocations thereof…..:)

 

While I have been busy, doing my best to keep moving forward, please find the attached proof in Oklahoma just as in various other States of the Union, their legislative history of the adoption of the Income tax, you will find that each State of the Union, which has adopted such taxation, has provided legislative recognition of any federal income tax election (See: attached). Or read Oklahoma’s web portal cite yourself at Oklahoma Statutes Citationized, Title 68 – Revenue & Taxation – Chapter 1 – Tax Codes – Oklahoma Income Tax Act – Article 23 – Income Tax – Section 2323 – Definitions:

 

Link: http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/DeliverDocument.asp?CiteID=92563.

 

Meaning, just as I stated, the same as I found in California here:

 

Germane to California, I did do a little research into their California Revenue & taxation Code, I did find that California recognizes federal income tax elections.

See: http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=RTC&sectionNum=17024.5.
Therein, specifically at section 17024.5 (e):

 

(e) Whenever this part allows a taxpayer to make an election, the following rules shall apply:

(1) A proper election filed with the Internal Revenue Service in accordance with the Internal Revenue Code or regulations issued by “the secretary” shall be deemed to be a proper election for purposes of this part, unless otherwise provided in this part or in regulations issued by the Franchise Tax Board.

(2) A copy of that election shall be furnished to the Franchise Tax Board upon request.

(3) (A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B), in order to obtain treatment other than that elected for federal purposes, a separate election shall be filed at the time and in the manner required by the Franchise Tax Board.

(B) (I) If a taxpayer makes a proper election for federal income tax purposes prior to the time that taxpayer becomes subject to the tax imposed under this part or Part 11 (commencing with Section 23001), that taxpayer is deemed to have made the same election for purposes of the tax imposed by this part, Part 10.2 (commencing with Section 18401), and Part 11 (commencing with Section 23001), as applicable, and that taxpayer may not make a separate election for California tax purposes unless that separate election is expressly authorized by this part, Part 10.2 (commencing with Section 18401), or Part 11 (commencing with Section 23001), or by regulations issued by the Franchise Tax Board.

(ii) If a taxpayer has not made a proper election for federal income tax purposes prior to the time that taxpayer becomes subject to tax under this part or Part 11 (commencing with Section 23001), that taxpayer may not make a separate California election for purposes of this part, Part 10.2 (commencing with Section 18401), or Part 11 (commencing with Section 23001), unless that separate election is expressly authorized by this part, Part 10.2 (commencing with Section 18401), or Part 11 (commencing with Section 23001), or by regulations issued by the Franchise Tax Board.

(iii) This subparagraph applies only to the extent that the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code or the regulation issued by “the secretary” authorizing an election for federal income tax purposes apply for purposes of this part, Part 10.2 (commencing with Section 18401) or Part 11 (commencing with Section 23001).

Link: http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes.xhtml;jsessionid=4da2f102810292b5b394083be2b3.

===========

Also, it is noted that California allows perfecting such ‘elections’ under its

California RTC (Revenue & Taxation Code) – Division 2 – Other Taxes – [6001-60709] – Part 10.2 – ADMINISTRATION OF FRANCHISE AND INCOME TAX LAWS [18401 – 19802] – Chapter 1 – General Provisions – Article 1 – General Application – [18401 – 18410.2]. More specifically, as noted at section 18405(d)(2).

Link: http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=RTC&sectionNum=18405.

It seems I’m finally able to squash anywhere income taxation in any Buck Act State (Title 4 U.S.C. 106) arising by creation of contract with the States of the Union thereafter, via each of the States Attorney General. See the Buck Act, 4 U.S.C. 104-113, 5 U.S.C. §5517. From whence arises the Agreement on Coordination of Tax Administration (ACTA) between the Attorney General and the Secretary of the Treasury. GOTCHA…..lol…lol.

Let me what you think & how your doing from time to time…:)

All our most precious regards to our breathren & all walks of life seeking honor.

Until then, I AM

Your friend In law!

Most graciously
.’In Honor We Trust’
Magnus Regnant of Sovereign Earth Alliance

Link: http://www.seagov.net/.
Notice: U.P.C. Applicable.

P.S.: Please forgive any incorrect scripture, syntax or grammatical errors.

 

About arnierosner

As an American I advocate a republic form of government, self-reliance, and adherence to the basic philosophy of the founding fathers and the founding documents, I ONLY respect those who respect and "HONOR" their honor. No exceptions!
This entry was posted in Civil Rights Violations. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s