An Agent of the Crown: ”Constitutional Attorney; Constitutional Scholar and Constitutional expert.”

On Mar 9, 2015, at 4:15 PM, Steve Curry <> wrote:
ery well stated, Michael!  

     We must remember, too, that members of the judiciary are NOT!!….I repeat, NOT!!, government employees, or public officers, but rather private, foreign, for-profit, corporate pirates, and those “judges” who issue Oaths of Office, and those “judges” taking Oaths of Office are committing Perjury, and a host of other criminal acts, including sedition & treason, against all those who come before them in their admiralty courts of injustice!

     With the term “injury” being defined as “ANY invasion of a lawful right,” these judiciary members who are criminally impersonating “government agents,” and “public officers,” ANY individual, or a “collective of individuals,” may file a NON-JUDICIAL, Constitutional Criminal Complaint against the fraudulent “Commercial Contract,” and against the individual “judge,” whenever an Oath of Office is either given, or taken, by a “judge!”

     We need to have these criminals walk their own planks!!  May the sharks have mercy on their worthless souls!!  It will, then, be a fight for survival between two predators!!  Any wagers on the winner of this bout?

     Any individual NOT filing, or NOT accepting, a Constitutional Criminal Complaint, or a BOE, against one or more of these “judges,” a.k.a. “Criminal Impersonators,” is aiding & abetting a criminal felon, and a criminal enterprise!!

Bon Apatite!

On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Gar Whit <> wrote:

———- Forwarded message ———-

From: Michael Gaddy <>

Date: Mon, Mar 9, 2015

A few weeks back, I was involved in an email exchange with a man who variously referred to himself as “Constitutional Attorney; Constitutional Scholar and Constitutional expert.” I had not contacted this person directly but he responded to an email I sent others concerning the Article V or COS issue.

During our exchange, this person who shall remain nameless, took considerable offense that I referred to members of Congress and other elected officials who failed to honor their oaths as criminals. I have had others who become quite offended when I have referred to various public officials, elected or appointed, who routinely violate their sacred oath to our Constitution as “criminals.”

On the national level, if you would like to see how frequently or infrequently your representative, or any representative in Congress, votes with the Constitution, that information can be found in the FREEDOM INDEX at the New American Magazine.

When it comes to local and state elected and appointed officials, you are on your own. It does help if you have a working knowledge of the Constitution and Bill of Rights, otherwise you won’t have a clue whether their oaths are being adhered to or not. Political Party loyalty is prima facie evidence you do not care about constitutional votes and/or adherence to sacred oaths.

Below you will find evidence of my allegation that those who do not faithfully adhere to their oaths of office are indeed criminals. One would hope that a Constitutional Attorney, Scholar or expert would know this.

All three branches of government take a similar oath. State and local oaths of office can vary to some extent but all require an oath to uphold and defend. Keep in mind they all must swear to follow their oath throughout their tenure in office under penalty of law.

I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United  States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and  that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter:

So  help me God.

The specific federal law prohibiting violation of the above oath is worded as follows:

Federal law regulating oath of office by government officials is divided into four parts along with an executive order which further defines the law for purposes of enforcement. 5 U.S.C. 3331, provides the text of the actual oath of office members of Congress are required to take before assuming office. 5 U.S.C. 3333 requires members of Congress sign an affidavit that they have taken the oath of office required by 5 U.S.C. 3331 and have not or will not violate that oath of  office during their tenure of office as defined by the third part of the law, 5 U.S.C. 7311 which explicitly makes it a federal criminal offense (and a violation of oath of office) for anyone  employed in the United States Government (including members of Congress) to “advocate the  overthrow of our constitutional form of government”. (A case can be made that voting or acting contrary to the principles and restraints of the Constitution is advocating for a different form of government which would require the “overthrow” of the present form.) The fourth federal law, 18 U.S.C. 1918 provides penalties for violation of oath office described in 5 U.S.C. 7311 which include: (1)  removal from office and; (2) confinement or a fine.

About arnierosner

As an American I advocate a republic form of government, self-reliance, and adherence to the basic philosophy of the founding fathers and the founding documents, I ONLY respect those who respect and "HONOR" their honor. No exceptions!
This entry was posted in Civil Rights Violations. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s