May not be directly related:
North Carolina Judge Ridgeway Rules Govt. Agencies & Officials Are “Private Entities” !
25.09.2011 17:21 in rodney-class-vs-us
Wake County (NC) Superior Court Judicial Review Judge Ridgeway Upholds That Govt. Agencies & Officials Are “Private Entities” !Do Police Officers (and Depts. / Agencies), and Elected Officials
As “Private” Security Guards At Walmart ?
Post Oak Public Relations
978 – 635 – 9586
For Immediate Release
9.25.11Raleigh, NC — Judicial Review Judge, Paul C. Ridgeway, Wake County General Court Of Justice, Superior Court Division, has upheld a lower court ruling that Public Officials / Agencies are “private entities” and immune from liability. Judge Ridgeway has upheld the earlier (1.17.11) ruling of lower court Judge J. Randall May in Class v. NORTH CAROLINA, Case No. 10 DOT 7047 (now known as 11 CVS 1559 in Judge Ridgeway’s ruling).The September 15, 2011 ruling creates a conflict in the public’s perception of basic government legitimacy because Judge Howard E. Manning, Jr (who recused himself in August 2011) declared in Mr. Class’ 4.21.11 hearing that “the Defendants were NOT ‘private entities’ or ‘private contractors’.” !
Are the judges confused ? Are the “government” agencies and officials NOT what they’re portraying to their constituents ? Are they immune because they’re “private” ? Do we actually have government “agencies” and elect “Public” Officials OR do we deal with “Private Entities” ? Is the public being frauded ? So many questions ! So many conflicts !
Judge May’s original 1.17.11 ruling:
Page 1 http://min.us/mbmc4SfNoQ
Page 2 http://min.us/m9ygLN5Fe
Page 2A (marked for emphasis) http://min.us/myxFZuE3d
Page 3 http://min.us/mbrIPmoLmaJudge Ridgeway’s 9.15.11 ruling upholding Judge May is viewable at:http://min.us/mbi7bovuy0
Mr. Class’ filing, that includes recused Judge Manning’s statement, that was the subject of the Ridgeway ruling, is viewable at:
919 – 792 – 4325 or 919- 792- 4400 or 919 – 792 – 4000. Or visit the court’s website at http://web.co.wake.nc.us/courts/directory.html.
Mr. Class’ original suit (Case No. 10 DOT 7047) accused the named State departments and individuals with charges of Embezzlement of Federal funds from the local political subdivisions, and violations of the Right To Travel issue.Mr. Class was acting as a Private Attorney General under provisions of an 1866 Federal Act, and was acting on behalf of all People, and political subdivisions “similarly situated” and affected by the charges in his Judicial Review.Mr. Class may be contacted at email@example.com or his office 704-742-3123 for details regarding the implications of Judge Ridgeway’s ruling and the court’s behavior in this action.
Recent update 11-27-2014
Mr. Class no longer conducts twice weekly radio shows on the Talkshoe Network at http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/talkCast.jsp?masterId=48361 and archives of previous shows are available at the above link.
The website for all things Rod Class, including other actions he has in play, is at http://rodclass.com. For a copy of one of the early filings that may have caused both court’s consternation: http://www.rayservers.com/blog/rod-class-traffic-filing
Mr. Class has posted all of his filings, and responses from the court, and the defendants, on the Internet at various sites for the benefit of those in their efforts and interactions with these purported “private entities” (contractors).
– 30 –