Thanks to Tony.
Others have noticed too…
General David E. Quantock,
the Commanding General of
the U.S. Army
Criminal Investigation Command (CID)
in his official capacity as Provost Marshal General
Re: A MATTER OF IMMEDIATE URGENCY
Dear General Quantock,
Sorry General, we are running out of time. As mentioned in the previous complaint, recent reports would lead one to believe the Obama administration is attempting to incite a civil war through race baiting and other subversive activities about which even you must be aware. So shall we dispense with the theatrics and get down to serious business here.
Your obligation is clear. As an American, and in a unique position of responsibility and trust, you are duty bound to honor your oath and immediately act to protect the Constitution and preserve the safety and security of the American people.
Also, you must immediate perform what ever steps it takes to suspend all government activities in order to suppress what might appear to be a movement by certain Obama administration agencies to launch an insurrection and rebellion against the lawful authority of the true American government…the Constitution. Launching an immediate investigation into the criminal activities and violations of the Constitution must follow.
It is time to convene a committee of impartial citizens selected at random to oversee operations and to offer insight into identifying the various violations and abuses that have been committed by various individuals within the government. A public oversight committee may act in the capacity as a caretaker government until new elections by Constitutionally eligible individuals may be scheduled.
General Quantock, I am certain I don’t have to tell you obama was never eligible to hold the office of president of the American people. Therefore general, it is obvious to all that orders from obama are unlawful and illegal. That would include the stand-down orders he issued at Benghazi.
Regrettably so…but it does explains obama’s behavior in Benghazi. As everyone knows general, the primary responsibility of a real American president is to protect American lives. The Benghazi stand-down, was not only contrary to American Army policy, (General, you are in the Army…right?) but also to my knowledge, the only exception in American history, to our long-standing military heritage and tradional policy of never leaving our people behind.
Quoted from: The Warrior Ethos: Why We Leave No One Behind | TIME.com http://nation.time.com/2012/05/17/the-warrior-ethos-why-we-leave-no-one-behind/#ixzz2jIMed2ad
In the U.S. Armed Forces, we don’t leave anyone behind.
It’s one of the basic pillars of what the Army calls the Warrior Ethos:
“I will never leave a fallen comrade.”
I am sure you can appreciate the sensitivity all Americans have in response to this issue….It sort of proves the point doesn’t it?
In my view, no legitimate American president would ever give such an order. In fact, general, we all know that obama was the only one who could issue such an order…even if he was acting unlawfully in the capacity of the real commander in chief.
Now as to obeying unlawful orders, I am no expert in the law sir, but as one of the people, it is my understanding that the military training includes educating those in the military that they are not to follow unlawful orders. Please feel free to correct me if I am wrong.
Oh yes, general, in case you missed some of these incidents, for your reference….
Please find a list of 365 examples compiled by a blogger known as, “Dan from squirrel hill,” (http://danfromsquirrelhill.wordpress.com). All of the items cited have been represented as matters of public record.
For your convenience and obvious reasons sir, the following is for your review and comment:
This section may be of particular interest.
(In RCM 302(b) Who may apprehend. The following officials may apprehend any person subject to trial by court-martial:
(1) Military law enforcement officials.
(2) Commissioned, warrant, petty, and noncommissioned officers.
The UCMJ on illegal orders
The Uniform Code of Military Justice is more concerned about failure of military personnel to obey legitimate orders than it is about refusal to obey illegitimate orders, but it does address the subject. In Section 16c(1)(c) it provides:
Lawfulness. A general order or regulation is lawful unless it is contrary to the Constitution, the laws of the United States, or lawful superior orders or for some other reason is beyond the authority of the official issuing it.
And in Section 14c(2)(a)(i):
Inference of lawfulness. A order requiring the performance of a military duty or act may be inferred to be lawful and it is disobeyed at the peril of the subordinate. This inference does not apply to a patently illegal order, such as one that directs the commission of a crime.
These provisions allow for the disobedience of illegal orders, but such orders may themselves constitute a crime, or be part of a criminal conspiracy, either under military or civilian law. Under federal law, 18 USC 242, it is illegal for anyone under the color of law to deprive any person of the rights, privileges or immunities secured by the U.S. Constitution, and under 18 USC 241 it is illegal to conspire to violate such rights. It is a felony punishable by up to 10 years in prison. This could be applied to military personnel who abuse the rights of citizens, either military or civilian. The UCMJ also defines an Article 134 offense: Impersonating a commissioned, warrant, noncommissioned, or petty officer, or an agent or official. This could apply to a military officer who impersonates a civilian official in an action against civilians. This includes actions taken under martial law. In RCM 202(a):
The exercise of jurisdiction under Article 2(a)(11) in peacetime has been held unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of the United States. Article 2(a)(10) has also been limited.
In RCM 302(b) Who may apprehend. The following officials may apprehend any person subject to trial by court-martial:
(1) Military law enforcement officials.
(2) Commissioned, warrant, petty, and noncommissioned officers.
However, anyone, including the lower enlisted grades, may apprehend for violation of civilian laws, provided it is done as an independent act of a citizen and not under orders.
Also be aware of the Posse Comitatus Act, which forbids members of the Army and Air Force to be used for domestic law enforcement.
The key point is this: You not only have the right to disobey an illegal order, but you may also have the duty to apprehend the parties issuing such an order if such issuance is part of the commission of a crime.
General, I hope you find the information provided to be helpful and enlightening. We the people are watching your actions very closely as it is becoming very apparent, the conditions addressed in earlier messages are becoming more troublesome. Removing almost 200 high ranking military officers, without reasonable cause, would seem to infer a serious intent on the part of the usurper obama to do deliberate harm to the American republic.
General, at minimum, even through the eyes of this ordinary citizen, obama’s actions can only be viewed as insurrection and rebellion against the supreme law of the land; the Constitution.
Once more your duty would seem clear to any reasonable American. Your oath of office demands your primary obedience to protect the Constitution; not the usurper.
Has America lost you sir?
As one of the people,
On Oct 30, 2013, at 9:44 PM, “AGP” <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
?PURGE OF THE AMERICAN MILITARY
Tea Party Views
“IN GOD WE TRUST”
“I bring reason to your ears, and, in language as plain as ABC, hold up truth to your eyes.” Thomas Paine, December 23, 1776
?The only commander I can ever remember being relieved of command was General Douglas MacArthur.
OBAMA has shitcanned more officers than any other president in America’s history.
Defense: What the president calls “my military” is being cleansed of any officer suspected of disloyalty to or disagreement with the administration on matters of policy or force structure, leaving them compliant and fearful.
We recognize President Obama is the commander-in-chief and that throughout history presidents from Lincoln to Truman have seen fit to remove military commanders they view as inadequate or insubordinate.
Turnover in the military ranks is normal, and in these times of sequestration and budget cuts the numbers are expected to tick up as force levels shrink and missions change.
Yet what has happened to our officer corps since President Obama took office is viewed in many quarters as unprecedented, baffling and even harmful to our national security posture. We have commented on some of the higher profile cases, such as Gen. Carter Ham. He was relieved as head of U.S. Africa Command after only a year and a half because he disagreed with orders not to mount a rescue mission in response to the Sept. 11, 2012, attack in Benghazi.
Rear Adm. Chuck Gaouette, commander of the John C. Stennis Carrier Strike Group, was relieved in October 2012 for disobeying orders when he sent his group on Sept. 11 to “assist and provide intelligence for” military forces ordered into action in Bengazi by Gen. Ham.
Other removals include the sacking of two nuclear commanders in a single week — Maj. Gen. Michael Carey, head of the 20th Air Force, responsible for the three wings that maintain control of the 450 intercontinental ballistic missiles, and Vice Adm. Tim Giardina, the No. 2 officer at U.S. Strategic Command.
From Breitbart.com’s Facebook page comes a list of at least 197 officers that have been relieved of duty by President Obama for a laundry list of trumped up charges and sometimes even with no reason given. Trumped up charges range from “leaving blast doors on nukes open” to “loss of confidence in command ability” to “mishandling of funds” to “inappropriate relationships” to “gambling with counterfeit chips” to “inappropriate behavior” to “low morale in troops commanded.”
Nine senior commanding generals have been fired by the Obama administration this year, leading to speculation by active and retired members of the military that a purge of its commanders is under way.
Retired U.S. Army Maj. Gen. Paul Vallely, an outspoken critic of the Obama administration, notes how the White House fails to take action or investigate its own officials but finds it easy to fire military commanders “who have given their lives for their country.” Vallely thinks he knows why this purge is happening.
“Obama will not purge a civilian or political appointee because they have bought into Obama’s ideology,” Vallely said. “The White House protects their own.
That’s why they stalled on the investigation into Fast and Furious, Benghazi and ObamaCare. He’s intentionally weakening and gutting our military, our Pentagon and reducing us as a superpower, and any Field Grade General Officer in the ranks who disagrees or speaks out is being purged.”
Another senior retired general told TheBlaze on the condition of anonymity, because he still provide services to the country and fears possible retribution, that “they’re using the opportunity of the shrinkage of the military to get rid of people that don’t agree with them or do not toe the Obama line. Remember, as (former White House chief of staff) Rahm Emanuel said, never waste a crisis.”
To President Obama, the military of a once-feared superpower is nothing but an anachronistic vestige of an America whose exceptionalism and world leadership require repeated apologies. It must be gutted and fundamentally transformed into a force wearing gender-neutral headgear only useful for holding the presidential umbrella when it rains. It is to be “his” military and used only for “his” purposes.
Is Obama afraid of a Coup De’Etat????
Coup De’Etat: Sudden removal of a Government by a countries military, when General Officers feel the government is no longer capable of ruling the countries civilian population….