From: “Joseph Zernik, Human Rights Alert (NGO)” <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: [Lawsters:16650] : Whistleblower says Obama received financial aid as foreign student
Date: June 30, 2013 12:00:57 AM PDT
How is it possible?
The answer in short and simple: When government adopts fraud as its second nature, there is not much left in way of rights… Otherwise put, the whole notion of rights and rule of law are by now just a fiction. As Jon suggested for the 4th of July, keep telling it to your kids… (that is for mid-summer, mid-winter tell them about Santa).
Richard Fine was not a unique case. Richard Fine is an educated, well to do person, so the case got noticed. But more extensive research showed that about 50% of the people in the Los Angeles jails are held under patently fraudulent booking records.  It appears to be part of the general California policy of keeping the jails full at over capacity at all times, no matter how many prisons are built. Good business!
If you want to understand how the abuse of Richard Fine was made possible, in detail, you can read the Motion to Intervene in Richard Fine’s case in the Supreme Court.  After receiving it, Richard Fine’s legal assistant sent me a message that I provided “evidence of extensive criminality”.
It was data of this nature, which led the UN Human Rights Council to enter a note in its first ever report on Human Rights in the United States (2010) “corruption of the courts and the legal profession… in California.”
The Motion to Intervene records with all relevant documents, how Richard Fine was abused through coordinated fraud in several government electronic public legal record systems:
1) LA Superior Court – simulated ancillary proceedings on Contempt, where there was no order or judgment entered.
This was enabled by Sustain, the fraudulent case management system developed by LA Superior Court in the 1980’s, by now used in 11 states.
2) Sheriff’s Department – fraudulent electronic booking records, which , permit the entry of non-existing courts as the judicial authority.
This was enabled by Inmate Information Center, the fraudulent electronic record system of the Sheriff’s Department.
3) US District Court, US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit – fraudulent electronic records of minutes, orders, and judgment that were never entered as valid and effectual judicial records, but are presented to the public as such.
This was enabled by PACER and CM/ECF.
4) Supreme Court – fraudulent electronic records in the unnamed online system, which presents a docket (e.g. regarding Justice Kennedy’s denial of Fine’s petition), with no basis (no record existed in the paper court file to justify the entries in the docket).
10-04-18 Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) 5 Amended Appendix IX b: Zernik’s Declaration in re: April 16, 2010 search for records in the Courts microfilm judgments archive s
On Sunday, June 30, 2013 12:26:50 AM UTC+3, Arnie Rosner wrote:
Those seeking judicial justice need to heed the words of Dr. Zernik. Sheriff Baca is a Constitutional officer.
How is it possible for Sheriff Baca to enforce an unlawful order by then Judge Yaffe, which he knew to be unconstitutional?
How is it Sheriff Baca, a Constitutional officer, could ignore this gross violation of Dr. Fine’s civil rights for over a year?
How is it possible that Sheriff Baca could ignore the fact that Dr. Fine was never in any court in San Pedro?
Sheriff Baca….how is such a gross violation of your oath possible?
Governor Brown…how was it possible for SBX-211 to be created when you were attorney General?
How is it possible to legislate immunity for judicial fraud and misconduct?
How was it possible to influence the entire California legislative government to participate in wholesale fraud upon the people of California?