TIMELINE OF EVENTS
This is a work in progress. Active links will be provided as they become available. Meanwhile here is the lank to the main location of Randy’s activities.
Initial ——– that opened the floodgate exposing first hand to me just how corrupt some of our Public Officials have become.
A young couple, David and Bernita Kleensang contacted Donna Kozak from Omaha, Nebraska by telephone and asked if she would help protect their Civil Rights.
David and Bernita Kleensang where being attacked by the IRS.
Donna Kozak contacted me by phone and asked me if I would help protect their Civil Rights.
I agreed to help her and the Kleensangs provided they Demanded my help and Grant me Power of Attorney.
The Kleensang’s case was in U.S. District Court Case No. 8:12CR 56 brought by the IRS.
The Judge was Denying them Due Process of Law in this case.
The Kleensangs wanted to obtain Justice and protection of their Natural and Civil Rights as secured by the Constitution for the United States of America.
Therefore, I assisted the Kleensangs to file multiple Constitutional Criminal Complaints against Public Officials involved.
2012 -June 14th:
David and Bernita Kleensang went to court in the U.S. District Court in Omaha, Nebraska.
They appeared before Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp.
The purported purpose of the appearance was to stand trial in the IRS case No. 8:12CR56.
2012 -June 14th:
This was the trial week for David and Bernita Kleensang’s trial.
Donna Kozak was present at the trial.
Donna Kozak personally witnessed Judge Smith Camp violating David and Bernita Kleensang’s Natural and Civil Rights.
2012 -June 14 (on or about June 14th):
Donna Kozak was Mandated by 18 USC§ 4 to report the felony crimes committed by Judge Smith Camp to some Judge or someone in Civil or Military authority.
Donna Kozak filed as a proxy into the U.S. District Court in Omaha, Nebraska a Constitutional Criminal Complaint in behalf of the Kleensangs.
Donna Kozak filed as a proxy against Alienation of Consortium in the Nature of Mental Rape, Denial of Due Process, Jury Tampering, Kidnapping, False imprisonment, and Subornation of Perjury committed by Judge Smith Camp against the Kleensangs.
This Criminal Complaint was filed pursuant to Criminal Law 18 USC§ 4.
Judge Smith Camp converted this Criminal Complaint into a Motion by Forging (Forgery) a new Title and entered it into the current IRS case she was sitting on against the Kleensangs.
Once it was converted into a Motion, Judge Smith Camp dismissed the Criminal Complaint herself.
This con-game is known as a shell game. Where the pea is put under a new shell.
This is in direct violation of “Due Process of Law” by Judge Smith Camp because of her forgery.
This is a direct Conflict of Interest by Judge Smith Camp because of her vested interest.
It is against the Law to retaliate and tamper against a Witness.
2012 -September 11:
Judge Smith Camp violated her required Oath to the Constitutional for the United States of America.
Judge Smith Camp committed Perjury by Forging Title of Instruments.
Judge Smith Camp Denied the Kleensangs of Due Process of Law.
Judge Smith Camp violated her required Oath to the Constitution for the United States of America.
I assisted Donna Kozak in filing a 2nd Constitutional Criminal Complaint against Judge Smith Camp.
The first purpose to convert the document to civil is to evade Criminal Charges.
The second purpose is to gain filing fee value.
In Civil Cases filings, you have to pay filing fees according to the court rules.
In Civil Rights Criminal Cases, the government has to pay for all costs.
Judge John Gerrard converted this 2nd Constitutional Criminal Complaint into a Civil Complaint.
Judge John Gerrard then demanded that we pay a filing fee.
The Civil Rights Act of 1866
Mandates that the government officers initiate Criminal Proceedings against any party who has violated any Citizens Civil Rights.
At the expense of the United States.
This is part of the reason why the Judges don’t want the case to be a Criminal action against them.
The other reason the Judges want the Case to be a Civil Case is that they can call it frivolous and throw it into the wastebasket.
In all Civil Rights Criminal actions against the Judge, the Judges do not have any Immunity.
These Constitutional Criminal Complaints have been in use since1976, the Bi-Centennial year, and have never been challenged in any court of law, State or Federal.
Furthermore, they were Honored by Judge James M. Burns of the United States District Court, Portland, Oregon, a U.S. Constitutional Judge and by U.S. Magistrate Judge Gilbert Kleweno of the U.S District Court in Vancouver, Washington.
In 1976 four Criminal Complaints were filed against Judge Alfred T. Sulmonetti using this Criminal Complaint form, which resulted in the bonding company that was bonding Multnomah County, Portland Oregon, to withdraw their bonding for two years.
The Bonding Company valued the four Criminal Complaints at an average value of $500,000.00 each.
The bonding company discontinued the bond on Multnomah County and would not re-issue a bond on the county until Judge Alfred T. Sulmonetti was removed from the bench and no other company would bond the county.
Multnomah County Officials stubbornly refuse to remove Judge Alfred T. Sulmonetti from the bench and they had to dip into the Public tax coffers to pay off malpractice suits.
They got caught dipping into the Tax Coffers/General Fund after two years, which forced them to fire Judge Alfred T. Sulmonetti in order to get their bonding restored.
This Lien Process has been in used since February 11, 1997 and has never been proven by anyone to be an invalid process in any Court of Law, State or Federal.
I, Randy Due, then used these Criminal Complaint Affidavits of Obligation.
They have a ledgered street value of damages based upon 1976 values, which is consider to be a conservative evaluation, considering 40 years of inflation.
They are valued by Criminal Civil Rights Law 18 USC § 241 & 242.
I used them to place a Consensual Public Commercial Lien against Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp for her Criminal Behavior at $10,000 for each count.
This Consensual Public Commercial Lien was process served upon Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp by the Douglas County Sheriff in Omaha, Nebraska.
These Criminal Complaints and the Consensual Public Commercial Liens are both a First Amendment Administrative Commercial Lien Process
They are guaranteed by the First Amendment Right peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
This First Amendment Administrative Commercial Lien Process has a very gracious 3-month (Jewish) 90-day (statutory) Grace period built into it to provide the defendants the ability to “CONTEST” the charges should they feel in any way that the charges are “FALSE, FRIVOLOUS, OR FRAUDULENT”. When the defendant refuses and/or fails to “CONTEST” the criminal charges within the very gracious 3-month (Jewish) 90-day (statutory) Grace period, they activate the Commercial Lien process against themselves to become a Debt Collection Option against their required Bonds and/or Public Official Liability Insurance and all their real and movable property and rights to property.
It is impossible for the Public Officials to Lawfully claim that these Commercial Internationally Negotiable Instruments are “FALSE, FRIVOLOUS, OR FRAUDULENT” when they “DEFAULT” on the Administrative 3-month (Jewish) 90-day (statutory) Grace Period given to them.
Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp had “Defaulted” by refusing to “Contest” the Criminal Charges and the Consensual Public Commercial Lien against her Criminal Behavior,
2013 – February 6:
I signatured the Default Judgment (Nihil Dicit) under Notary Affidavit and had process served upon Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp.
Edmond and Kathleen Jesse Case No. CI 11-58
I was on a weekly radio broadcast with KSDZFM.com in Gordon, Nebraska.
I was talking about the Kleensang case when Kathleen Jesse heard my broadcast.
Kathleen Jesse contacted me seeking help to protect their Life Estate from Corrupt Local Public Officials
Local Corrupt Public officials were attempting to steal their Life’s work from them.
Exhibit of Fact:
The Elderly Jesses owned 12,000 acres in the Sand Hills of Western Nebraska with over 1000 head of livestock.
Exhibit of Fact:
The Elderly Jesses were completely out of Debt with $86,622.75 in the bank.
Edmond and Kathleen Jesse had been fighting to keep their ranch for approximately 8 months before contacting me.
They contacted me after they had run out of options with Attorneys.
The Attorneys were part of the system to Cheat and Steal their Life Estate from them.
Case No. CI 11-58 has several other subordinate cases connected to it.
Case No. CI 12-235, state what it is about
CI 12-235-66, state what it is about
CI 12-35, state what it is about
CI 13-16 state what it is about
Terry Curtiss keeps adding other case #’s to complicate and to evade the Affidavits that have been filed in other cases.
2012 –March 12:
At the request of Terry Curtiss, attorney for the opposing side in Case No. CI 11-58,
Judge Travis P. O’Gorman Appointed Sheridan County Attorney, Dennis D. King, as acting receiver in case No. CI 11-58.
Dennis D. King was to confiscate all money in the ranch bank account and disperse all assets of the ranch.
Judge Travis P. O’Gorman in the District Court of Sheridan County, Nebraska.
Judge Travis P. O’Gorman ordered Dennis D. King to obtain a bond to secure his Faithful Performance of Duties to protect the assets of the ranch parties involved.
2012 –April 25:
Dennis D. King presented a Cash Bond of only $1000.00
This cash Bond was purportedly to cover the $86,622.75 cash in the bank and the additional value of all the ranch land, of which 10,000 acres was under attack and over 1000 head of livestock and all machinery.
We are looking at over Ten Million worth of assets,
A Cash Bond of $1000 dollars can only bond $1000 dollars worth of value and only a $1000 Distress Process.
2012 –April 30:
Dennis D. King the appointed receiver.
Dennis D. King seized $86,622.75 from the ranch bank account held in a Wells Fargo Bank.
Dennis D. King has failed to produce a Lawful Distress Bond to the Bank.
Thus Dennis D. King Embezzled and stole $85,622.75
Wells Fargo Bank engaged in this act of Securities Fraud.
Wells Fargo Bank has become an Accessory Accomplice to the Criminal Behavior of these Public Officials.
Judge Travis P. O’Gorman held a Court Hearing in the Sheridan County District Court against Ed and Kathleen Jesse.
Judge Travis P. O’Gorman charged them with Contempt for not providing ranch documents that the opposing attorney Terry Curtiss was demanding.
The Elderly Jesses didn’t have these documents in their possession or available to them.
2012 –August 13:
Edmond and Kathleen Jesse were thrown into Jail on a Civil Contempt charge for failure to provide these documents, which they didn’t have available to them..
Sheriff Terry Robbins threw them into jail.
Sheriff Terry Robbins didn’t have an arrest warrant supported by a sworn Affidavit as required by the 4th Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America.
2012 –August 18:
Ed and Kathleen Jesse were locked in Jail.
Sheriff Terry Robbins oversaw the Stealing by Cattle Rustling of the Livestock from the Jesse Ranch in Sheridan County Nebraska.
Dan Otte the local livestock auctioneer having a Company by the name of Sheridan County Livestock Auction procured Truckers to aid and abet in this criminal action.
These livestock were hauled to Dan Otte’s Livestock sale barn.
Rita Collins, Kathleen Jesse’s sister, was ranch sitting for Ed and Kathleen Jesse while they were in Jail.
Rita Collins was a witness when this cattle rustling took place and has presented pictures of the cattle rustling and the parties involved.
I assisted Rita Collins to begin filing Criminal Complaints against the Public Officials and their Accessory Accomplices.
The Public Officials were violating Ed and Kathleen Jesse’s Natural and Civil Rights.
Statement of Facts:
A minimum of Five (5) Constitutional Criminal Complaints has been filed into the U.S District Court in Omaha, Nebraska.
The Federal Judges refuse to prosecute their own.
Lawful Distresses were placed against some of the Criminal Parties Bonds and Assets.
Approximately twenty (20) Consensual Public Commercial Liens have been filed against the Public Officials and their Accessory Accomplices.
The Public Officials are involved in violating Ed and Kathleen Jesse’s Natural and Civil Rights.
Terry Curtiss, attorney for defendant in Case No. CI 11-58, filed a lawsuit.
Terry Curtiss is attempting to claim we had slandered the title to his and his wife’s property with the Distress and Lien.
She was hiding his Criminal gains under her name, acting as an alter ego for Terry Curtiss to protect him from losing his property because of his malpractice in his Law Business.
Terry Curtiss procured Judge Donald E. Rowlands to engage in Fraud involving the Court in an attempt to remove these Commercial Liens from attaching his property.
Statement of Events:
The first “Default Judgments (Nihil Dicit)” were process served on certain Defendants.
The term Nihil Dicit means; “He says Nothing; This is the name of the judgment which may be taken as of course against a defendant who omits to plea or answer the plaintiffs
declaration or complaint within the time limited.”Black’s Law Dictionary 4th Ed.
These were process served on Public Officials and their Accessory Accomplices who failed to “Contest” the Consensual Public Commercial Liens and the supporting charges.
This Default activated the Commercial Liens into a Commercial Debt Collection Option Instrument against their Bonds, Public Official Liability Insurance Polices, All Real and Movable Property and Rights to Property.
2013 –May 29:
In Case No. CI 12-235-66 District Court of Box Butte County Nebraska.
This is the Lawsuit that Terry Curtiss is attempting to stop the Commercial Liens from attaching to his and his wife’s property.
Judge Donald E. Rowlands signed a “JUDGMENT FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND COST”. This was for the benefit of Terry Curtiss against EDMOND R. JESSES and KATHLEEN M. JESSE, Husband and wife; and RANDY DUE.
This Judgment for Terry Curtiss now causes him to be involved in additional Personal Commercial Liability in this case and all other cases connected to this case.
This Judgment has now engaged Judge Donald E. Rowlands as an Accessory Accomplice to Terry Curtiss’ Criminal Behavior.
RANDY DUE CRIMINAL CASE NO. 8:12CR344
Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp “Defaulted” by refusing to “Contest” the Criminal Charges and the Consensual Public Commercial Lien against her Criminal Behavior.
I signatured under Notary Affidavit and had process served upon Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp a “Default Judgment (Nihil Dicit)”.
2013 –March 7:
Because of me obeying the Laws, 18 USC § 4 and 2382, that mandate I report Criminal Behavior to some Judge or someone in Civil or Military authority.
By me exercising my First Amendment Administrative Commercial Lien Right, Peaceably to assemble, to Petition the government and its Agents for redress of grievances.
I was kidnapped by the FBI in retaliation for learning how to hold our Public Officials accountable to their required Oaths to the Constitution for the United States of America.
2013 –March 7:
United States District Court Judge Thomas Q. Langstaff acting in the Nature of a U.S. Magistrate Judge in Albany, Georgia.
Judge Thomas Q. Langstaff threw me into jail without an arraignment.
2013 –March 11:
I was hauled in cuffs and chains before Judge Thomas Q. Landstaff for an Identification hearing and then thrown back into jail.
2013 –March 14, approximately:
I was transported from Ocilla, Georgia County Jail to Leavenworth, Kansas to spend a week.
2013 –March 21, approximately:
I was transported to the Douglas County Jail in Omaha, Nebraska.
2013 –March 28, approximately:
Judge Thomas Thalken gave me a purported arraignment in the District Court in Omaha, Nebraska.
Notice that this is 21 days after being thrown into jail.
The law requires a person be arraigned within 72 hours after detainment.
2013 –April 10:
I was released by Judge Thalken after signing a conditional release under Coercion and Duress.
I signed the conditional release in order to go back to Georgia to obtain Medical Care for my Life Threatening Medical needs.
The court system refused to provide for my medical needs in jail.
When any party signs under “Coercion and Duress” this makes Null and Void the Contract.
Each of these events gave me first hand understanding of what, how and why the system violates Citizen’s Civil Rights every day.
Which is what I will attempt to explain for you.
So that you may be better prepared to defend yourself from Public Officials.
Defend yourself from Public Officials who are violating your Natural and Civil Rights of Freedom, Liberty and Pursuit of Happiness.
RANDY DUE CIVIL CASE NO. 8:13CV00122
The first part of May 2013, I was process served by my local Sheriff department a Civil Lawsuit, “COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF” by Agents of the United States, Deborah R. Gilg, U.S. Attorney and Robert L. Homan, Assistant U.S. Attorney, against my person.
CO-CONSPIRACY CONNECTION OF ALL CASES
As time permits, I will attempt to provide details to each of the above events as to WHY, HOW, WHAT, WHEN AND WHERE the Public Officials operate to violate your Natural and Civil Rights of Freedom, Liberty and Pursuit of Happiness.
Then I will share with you what I have learned first hand that can help you protect yourself from the Criminal Behavior of Public Officials who violate your Natural and Civil Rights of Freedom, Liberty and Pursuit of Happiness and hold these Criminals accountable.
UPGRADES TO THESE EVENTS
There are certain lessons involved in each of the above events that have occurred, which will help you, as the reader, to learn to protect your Freedoms, Liberties and Pursuit of Happiness.
We will add more Events and links to each event, as I am able to provide Arnie with the documents containing the “Full Disclosure” of Information you need to learn to protect your Freedoms by the information I have gained by my experiences of by being thrown into jail.
I wish to Freely share what I have learned from the process of being thrown into jail, with everyone seeking to protect the Constitution for the United States of America and the Freedoms, Liberties and Pursuit of Happiness secured by the Constitution and laws pursuant thereto.