Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger
Senator Tom Harman
Assembly Member Van Tran
The question begs to be asked!
What has happened to the citizens oversight on government?
It is a protection guaranteed by the US Constitution and the California Constitution!
Who has stolen this protection from the people?
Government has consistently demonstrated it cannot be trusted to regulate itself!
None of this would have been possible with the citizens right to convene independent grand juries not under the control of prosecutors or judges.
Further investigation reveals this Constitutional protection has been denied citizens of California and usurped by the creation of the
“Judicial Council of California”
Based on Section 2 and 8 of the California Constitution please state what authority presumes to deny the constitutional rights of the people of California to oversee their government?
Sec. 2. All political power is inherent in the people. Government is instituted for the protection, security, and benefit of the people; and they have the right to alter or reform the same, whenever the public good may require it.
Sec. 8. No person shall be held to answer for a capital or otherwise infamous crime, (except in cases of impeachment, and in cases of militia when in actual service, and the land naval forces in time of war, or which this State may keep with the consent of Congress in time of peace, and in cases of petit larceny under the regulation of the Legislature) unless on presentment or indictment of a grand jury; and in any trial in any court whatever, the party accused shall be allowed to appear and defend in person and with counsel, as in civil actions. No person shall be subject to be twice put jeopardy for the same offence; nor shall he be compelled, in any criminal case, to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation.
Citizen Reporter for the Post & Email
Available 24/7 – Defending freedom has become a full-time job!
714-501-8247 – mobile
Judicial Corruption – Continued
Date: October 12, 2010 3:46:49 PM PDT
Cc: “Smith, Darcy \(USMS\)” <Darcy.Smith@usdoj.gov>, “Shell, Thomas\(USMS\)” <Thomas.Shell@usdoj.gov>
Subject: High level financial management fraud at the Los Angeles Superior Court and Sheriff’s Department – A call for action by US law enforcement
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Charles McCoy, Presiding Judge; _John Clarke, Clerk;_ __ _ _ Leroy Baca, Sheriff
High Level Financial Management Fraud at the Los Angeles Superior Court and the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department – A Call for Action by US Law Enforcement
Los Angeles, October 13 – Human Rights Alert (NGO) called for action by US law enforcement regarding mounting evidence of high-level financial management fraud at the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles (LASC) and the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department (LASD).
Secret bank accounts, controlled by the judges of the LASC were exposed over a decade ago in a series of reports by the Washington DC Insight Magazine, titled “…Is Justice for Sale in L.A.?”.
 The reports documented the existence of secretive corporations, controlled by the judges of the LASC, and fund movements in and out of such corporations, which were inconsistent with the conduct of an honest court.
Regardless, no report of actions by IRS, FBI, or US Dept of Justice in this regard was ever found. Last time it was checked (around 2009), such corporations were still listed by the California Secretary of State.
Additionally, Human Rights Alert documented the designation of all Court fees in certain cases of the LASC as “Journal Entry”, whereas in other cases such fees are recorded as “Filing Fees”, “Motion Fees”, “Stipulation Fees”, etc.
 Presiding Judge Charles McCoy and Clerk of the Court John A Clarke, denied repeated requests to disclose the ultimate designation of such funds.
 Accountancy textbook consider the misuse of “Journal Entry” as a cardinal sign of high-level financial management fraud. Of note, until recently the LASC never permitted public access to its financial reports, and today it publishes unaudited financial reports.
The online publication by the LASD of false financial records pertaining to bail amounts, which were collected from prisoners, was likewise documented by Human Rights Alert.
The LASD refused to this date to answer on complaints on the matter, which alleged public corruption and large-scale financial fraud in bail/bond operations of the Department.
 United Nations Human Rights Council (HRC) staff report,
 which was recently issued as part of the 2010 Universal Periodic Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States, referred to: “…corruption in the courts and the legal profession, and discrimination of US law enforcement in California. 69″… “69 HRAlert, pages 1-5. See submission for cases cited.” The statements were based on the April 2010 submission by Human Rights Alert, which provided evidence of large-scale false imprisonments at the criminal courts, and real estate fraud in collusion with large financial institutions and law-firms at the civil courts.
The submission was based on media, expert, and official reports from the past two decades, as well as analysis of court records in a series of cases opined as fraud and perversion of justice by judges of the LASC.
The reference in the HRC report to “discrimination of US law enforcement in California”, pertained to evidence of the refusal by US law enforcement for at least two decades to address overwhelming evidence of racketeering by judges of the LASC.
In its report, Human Rights Alert called upon the US Congress to enact Federal Rules for Public Access to Electronic Court Record, Case Management, and Electronic Court Fling, as quintessential for restoration of integrity of the courts in the United States, for restoration of the Rule of Law, and for the safeguard of Human Rights in the digital era.
Human Rights Alert also called upon the United States to effectively engage in a cooperative efforts with internationally charged observers and rappeurtors, as part of the ongoing UPR process from 2010 to 2014.
Human Rights Alert expressed its confidence that the outcome of the first ever international review of Human Rights in the United States, would be a landmark event, and that the United Nations HRC would vote on an effectual Human Rights report on the United States in its November 5, 2010, UPR session in Geneva, Switzerland.
Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles, California, and beyond. Special emphasis is given to the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of integrity of the justice system.
 99-04-11 Washington DC Insight Magazine – LA Superior Court Judges ‘Slush’ Fund – Is Justice for Sale in L.A.?
 10-02-13 Galdjie v Darwish (SC052737) at the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles: Alleged racketeering by judges and attorneys in Los Angeles, California – Requesting Jerry Brown’s comments
 10-02-05 Mysterious Finances of the Los Angeles Superior Court
 10-02-12 Complaint #4 filed with Los Angeles Sheriff Lee Baca Re Corruption of Bond Bail Services
10-01-10 United Nations Human Rights Council Records for 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States: