You of all people know the real truth

You of all people know the real truth

You of all people know the real truth.  The fact that you would lie and blame our situation on the current conditions attests to your dishonesty.

As you full well know…today’s problems began in the early 186o’s time frame.  A period when certain members of the Congress, deliberately defrauded the American people.  The 14th Amendment was presented falsely and totally misrepresented.

In 1957, the entire legislature of Georgia was joined by the state of Louisiana in calling Congress on this fraud.  In the same tradition that the corrupt members of Congress of today, who have also deliberately deceived and mislead America regarding issues like obamacare and Benghazi, the same lawyer class of Congress, committed fraud in the way that the 14th Amendment was unlawfully represented.  Much of the so called laws of today rely on this fraudulent legislation and the truth be told, nothing in the way of laws written and that appear on the books today are lawful.  Yes…and you sir—know this to be a fact.

No, not only are you lying to the American people, but every other candidate for elected office who will permit one more second to pass without calling for the immediate suspension of all political activity until this terrible injustice, perpetrated since 1862 on every man, woman and child, in America, is properly addressed.

The fact remains that every piece of legislation since 1862 is null and void.  That even the very structure of the government in which the American people have come to believe is also a lie. This includes the executive branch, the  judicial branch and yes…especially the legislative branch.

And not to be redundant, but you of all people know this to be true. The question is, what exactly will you do about it?

The question is what will every candidate for elected office do about it?
The question is what will every current lawful public officer do about it?


The answer I would propose…

No immediate action…No access to public office!
The fraud on the people must end!  NOW!


The truth; it takes so few words to express…

Available 24/7 -


714-501-8247 – mobile

| Leave a comment

Orly Taitz – Member of the California State Bar #223433

Voila_Capture 2014-11-22_04-02-44_PM

Image | Posted on by | Leave a comment

The lower hanging fruit—

Thank you for your comment and question.

Voila_Capture 2014-11-22_02-35-55_PM


May I point out, that the government of the American state citizen was set up in a way that each public servant took a separate oath to support and defend the Constitution of the united States of America.

Thinking about that, I realized there is no corrupt government. There are only corrupt individuals who consciously made the decision to dishonor those by whom they were elected or appointed, violated their lawful oath of office, violated their fiduciary responsibilities and commit treason.

You know folks, those who decided to dishonor us are not just the most obvious ones to which we are always pointed. Let us not forget that many of the support jobs of administrators, law enforcement officers, clerks, office workers and many other individuals accepting pay from the people are involved.

Just as an exercise in thought processes, can you imagine any of the impostors, who misrepresent themselves as our lawful members of Congress, attempting to function with no office or administrative staff? Well correct me if I am wrong on this but anyone performing any functions to support treason have no immunity from personal, financial liabilities as a result of participating in such crimes…and their spouses would also be included.

Going for the lower hanging fruit could be a very impressive way to remove the foundation on which this corrupt group of individuals function. Just a thought.




American Civil Flag – at Peace since 1874
The truth,,,,takes so few words to express!
Available 24/7 -
Posted in Administration Corruption, Constituion | Leave a comment

Time to call in the Coast Guard!


Thank you Jim. You did very well in providing the answer to my brief question.  Your detailed information is listed below:  Thank you.
The bottom line Jim..there is no lawful government in any state, county, city or any other type of area defined as some sort of a jurisdiction one might consider as a form of lawful government.
In summary, the American people, identified as American state citizens have no lawful government. The seats of lawful government of the States of America, now 50 strong, are vacant.
The details, complete with certification of the facts, may be found at the following link:
I can not over emphasize the importance of the information and evidence provided in an indisputable format that not be discredited by any live thinking human being.
Now you have more than adequately identified your efforts to seek lawful redress. You have the documented evidence of the fraud and the actions of the corrupt individuals who are carrying out the crimes against the American citizens in Colorado. So there can not be any doubt you have exhausted all legal remedies to seek resolution of the injuries committed against you.
So let us take a look at what is really going on: The following was just shared by Judge Anna von Reitz, of Alaska. She was responding to a question regarding the sheriff’s “March on Washington, D.C..” It seems to me this also fits the rest of the country as well.
But first you should know that There are three major jurisdictions that govern all aspects of the world. They are, the Air, the Sea and the Land. For purposes of this discussion that follows, only the jurisdictions of the Land and Sea are mentioned:
  • The Land Jurisdiction refers to America; the (50) States of America—As a result of the War of Independence.
  • The Sea Jurisdiction refers to international, navigable waters and essentially, issues addressed as belonging to admiralty. The Sea Jurisdiction is mostly controlled by the British Monarchy.
Wonderful letter, Steve–My note to Sheriff Mack would be much simpler. It would state that as the Sheriffs of land jurisdiction, the counties, it is their duty to protect the people and the assets of the land jurisdiction and don’t worry about Washington, DC. It is a foreign sovereign city state encased in the District of Columbia which is itself part of the foreign legislative democracy calling itself the United States of America Minor. Let them have their jurisdiction of the sea and rot in it. Keep your nose in your ownbusiness on the land and when they come to you and try to cause trouble in YOUR jurisdiction,THEN it is time for you to raise hell with THEM.
Since 1917 (War Powers Act) the “corporate Congress” has illegally conscriptedall American property “for the war effort” — and has retained a claim of controlling interest via therepeated “declarations of national emergency” and “declarations of war” — “War on Drugs” and”War on Poverty” and “War on Terror”, etc., etc., etc.As a result of this pathetic fraud being carried out against the American People by the members of Congress, the US Army has been an army of occupation on our State soil since 1917.
Under the Hague Conventions especially Hague IV, Article 55, which is a restatement of the LiborCode Articles 31 and 38, the US Army is the Usufruct benefiting from this situation and is the one responsible for paying all expenses including maintenance and mortgages owed on the conscripted property and is also responsible for returning all the property to the rightful non-combatant civiliansto whom it belongs at the close of hostilities.The Army subcontracted its responsibility by commissioning “civil officers” to oversee the situationand make sure that the Hague Convention was being honored and that the civilian population and their assets were being protected as required.
That’s how we got all these offices called things like”Lieutenant Governor” and “US Postmaster General” and “State Attorney General”. It is especiallythe State Attorney General’s responsibility to address any civilian complaints of wrong-doing,especially when there are equity claims against civilian property that has been conscripted——most notably, foreclosure as an example.
The corporate administrative tribunals are not recognizing the fact that all these foreclosure claims are rooted in probate fraud and involve clearly stated probate issues. The rats are attempting to avoid cognizance by rolling over the “ESTATE” trusts and “redefining” them as transmitting utilities operated under new ownership.
So Jim, Since the state attorney general has refused to perform his responsibilities as required under the Lieber Code and the Hague convention, then the district Commander of the Coast Guard is responsible to protect American state citizens.
Your see Jim, the franchise, the state of Colorado, is part of the Sea jurisdiction. However, on the land jurisdiction acting in their criminal behavior against peaceful American state citizens, they are considered as pirates.
Voila_Capture 2014-05-09_10-22-44_PM.jpgVoila_Capture 2014-11-22_01-52-53_PM
It is time to call in the Coast Guard to deal with the piracy.

For over two centuries the U.S. Coast Guard has safeguarded our Nation’s maritime interests in the heartland, in the ports, at sea, and around the globe. We protect the maritime economy and the environment, we defend our maritime borders, and we save those in peril. This history has forged our character and purpose as America’s Maritime Guardian — Always Ready for all hazards and all threats.

Today’s U.S. Coast Guard, with nearly 42,000 men and women on active duty, is a unique force that carries out an array of civil and military responsibilities touching almost every facet of the U.S. maritime environment.

The Coast Guard’s motto is Semper Paratus, meaning “Always Ready.”

The Eighth Coast Guard District, with district office in New Orleans, LA, is comprised of North Dakota, South Dakota, Wyoming, Nebraska, Iowa, Colorado, Kansas, Missouri, Kentucky, West Virginia, Tennessee, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama; that part of Pennsylvania south of 41 deg. N. latitude and west of 79 deg. W. longitude; those parts of Ohio and Indiana south of 41 deg. N. latitude; Illinois, except that part north of 41 deg. N. latitude and east of 90 deg. W. longitude; that part of Wisconsin south of 46 deg.20[min] N. latitude and west of 90 deg. W. longitude; that part of Minnesota south of 46 deg.20[min] N. latitude; those parts of Florida and Georgia west of a line starting at the Florida coast at 83 deg.50[min] W. longitude; thence northerly to 30 deg.15[min] N. latitude, 83 deg.50[min] W. longitude; thence due west to 30 deg.15[min] N. latitude, 84 deg.45[min] W. longitude; thence due north to the southern bank of the Jim Woodruff Reservoir at 84 deg.45[min] W. longitude; thence northeasterly along the eastern bank of the Jim Woodruff Reservoir and northerly along the eastern bank of the Flint River to Montezuma, GA.; thence northwesterly to West Point, GA.; and the Gulf of Mexico area west of a line bearing 199 T. from the intersection of the Florida coast at 83 deg.50[min] W. longitude (the coastal end of the Seventh and Eighth Coast Guard District land boundary.)Contact Information:
500 Pydras Street
New Orleans, LA 70130-3310
Phone: (504)-589-6277


American Civil Flag – at Peace since 1874
The truth,,,,takes so few words to express!
Available 24/7 -


On Nov 22, 2014, at 11:36 AM, Jim Porter <> wrote:

Good Morning Arnie.
There is no Republic form of government here, as per the decisions of my city, county or state government employees. The conscience decisions made, from the last 12 years I’ve been watching, are clearly documented and expose the piublic corruption, the individuals making those decisions and the reasons for the decisions.
With that said, a Republic form of government does not insure there will be no conflict(s) between the citizens of any community/jurisdiction. A Republic form of government would provide all citizens a mechanism to expose grievances publicly. Yet, as this would expose corrupt government employees for their actions, those individuals selectively apply rule to suit their situation.
A simple example of this is my attempt to use the state court system to expose local city government employees guilty of criminal fraud. The conspiracy included very high placed Colorado state employees, which at the time of the suit I had no confirmed knowledge of. My tact was to bring suit exposing the local player(s), with the strategy of exposing others not confirmed as part of the state wide plot.
My first problem revealed my lack of knowledge as to the non existence of character of state judicial employees. I accept full responsibility for that mistake based on my formal education of half truths provided to me by others I relied on for facts.
In the system I assumed to be lawful, I made specific allegation based upon documented proof to expose fraud, a crime with no statute of limitation. This produced a ruling of collateral estoppel before I had one single second in a state court of Statutory law. That ruling is used to bar a plaintiff from revisiting a complaint, with the thought that future revisiting of a specific case wastes the courts time for the purpose of reversing a court decision.
The hook in MY deal was I spent more money petitioning the state court of appeals in an effort to secure MY day in court. That effort produced a decision from the court of appeals saying as there was no state district court decision on MY filing, there was no decision to appeal.
I started re-educating myself based upon the premise there could be no collateral estoppel to bar future court visits, as I never made a visit to the state court and never received a state court ruling by confirmation of the appellate state court. This exercise in MY state government exposed to the fact it takes a lie to cover a lie. The definition of a lie is, a false statement made with deliberate attempt to deceive.
My continuing efforts to expose corruption brought me in front of the local city council and the board of county commissioner, to provide notice of my determination to expose the criminal elements working within these government bodies.
I stood before both panels during open public meetings and disclosed criminal facts while pointing to the individuals I was reporting as criminals. Those statements produced letters of response from the legal departments of the local city and the county governments stating my time had run out due to the statute of limitations.
The absence of a denial of charges in either letter gave me additional confirmation there where two sets of rules for directing government actions.
My continued efforts led to an Official Investigation through the Major Crimes Unit of the Colorado Bureau of Investigation, along with an Official Investigation by the u.S. Department of Justice. Multiple investigators from both agencies clearly stated criminal violations had been committed by the persons named in the government documents which I presented as evidence.
Each investigation developed individual department reports. The D.O.J. investigation resulted in my receiving a letter from the D.O.J. which exposed a D.O.J. employee as part of the criminal element in Colorado. That investigation has been shelved.
The investigators for the state filed a report to the department head in Denver confirming R.I.C.O. violations committed by multiple state government employees and that investigation resulted in the return of my documents and the state Law Department’s refusal to prosecute criminal employees.
The strategy of our current state and federal government employees is clearly stated through these department web-sites disclosing why there is no justice for all. The information is hidden in plain sight of the American People, and that is what I would like to present to the People.
*This was the first time I pulled Californian’s A.G. but notice the similarities of the three. All other states I’ve pulled are the same.
The people have no legal representation from the state attorney or the state Law Department
the people pay for. I started reading about these departments when I was physically escorted from the Department of Law building in Denver, Colorado. I was there to report a crime of fraud, but the person I reported it to was charged with defending the criminal state government employee.
Then on top of that, as disclosed in the text of the Colorado A.G. statement, it is disclosed the person is elected by a state wide vote. Title 30 in Colorado clearly states this person must fill a bond with the S.O.S. in Denver and that is not, nor ever has been on file.
If I’m one of the People this guy represents, the A.G. is out of trust to me. This revealed the situation that a Law Department criminal is charged with representing a criminal from another state department. No wonder I wasn’t wanted in the state Law Department building.
There is no Republic Anything here, it’s just a group of government employees working to serve themselves. And it is happening in every state.
The disclosure that any State Department of Law is charged with defending All State Department employees within that state, is ALL the evidence needed, by the People of that state, for exposure that the Judiciary is providing the firewall to criminal exposure.
If you are trying to recognize the importance of the firewall, it can be found in the C.A.F.R. of any municipal/government corporation located in this country. Here is an example…..
I owned a property which due to it’s location, held a staggering value based upon the properties development rights. I considered myself lucky for the opportunity of the purchase and started into the development phase of property ownership by requesting inclusion (annexation) into the city limits. This required a detailed plan to the city planning commission which revealed my intentions.
Another fact unknown to me at the time was my neighbors efforts to secure development right to his property. This neighbor entered into a secret plan, with two city employees, to strip me of my property in violation of statutes, or what I thought was law at the time. These violations contradicted several statutes (contracts) for a reason.
The most senior city employee involved in the taking was the City Manager, and he didn’t want to present the situation to the City Counsel with a plan of condemnation or eminent domain.
The budget didn’t have an extra 9 digit amount laying around, and that kinda of fraud would create a problem if the C.A.F.R. needed to be tapped. These guys proceeded to illegally take my property hoping I would slink away, and relinquish my position. Their plan started to fail for one specific reason, and that reason was one virtuous Colorado State Department employee. He followed the statute, which by statute should have defended and secured my position.
Instead, higher ranking State Department employees sided with the two city guys and the number of R.I.C.O. violations increased. This also tangled the state C.A.F.R. into the mix.
These C.A.F.R.’s become a big problem for criminals when they steal something of value from a private citizen, when that citizen pursues a legal action. If the citizen successfully exposes the illegal action(s), the government entity must pay, so a claim against the liability bond must be made. In my case the city purchases a 1 million dollar bond from a public insurance provider, so the rest of the money would come from another source, like the C.A.F.R.
As I paid for and presented a commercial Real Estate Appraisal to establish the amount of loss, not only would it require the entire city C.A.F.R. holding, but much of the state holding would be transferred too. These losses would demand criminal investigation and prosecution, a fact no criminal government employee wants to face.
What happened to me was by the rule of legal discovery of evidence to be brought before the court. The other side realized I had the evidence and would use it. This produced the court decision to not grant me a day in court.
Can you imagine what I would expose to the jury members? That decision, along with the ‘You can’t come back either’ ruling exposed the judiciary firewall which completed my information as to the rolls of all government departments in the day to day activities of government business.
As a side note to my story, the reason I started to investigate the county was term limits. Locally, we have people moving from city to county elected positions in a round robin way. To keep an eye on corruption, I followed these people to their new positions and requested the documents required for those positions.
I know the time is near for the American People to discover what their Government wants.
Then, the American People must come to believe, that which isn’t freely given by The People, will taken from The People by Government employees.
I hope to expose to the American People, the intentions of an unjust portion of our American Society, which has quietly taken temporary possession of the American Judicial System. Our leaders before us found the problem, and exposed it to the American People, while providing the solution to the problem for future American generations.
For those that do not see it coming, ‘The Future IS Here’. The Titles Of Nobility Act was purposefully added to the Constitution of the united States of America for the benefit of the American People.
(For those still trying to sell the idea the Constitution of the united States of America was accidentally Amended with the addition to the Bill of Rights of the Titles Of Nobility Act, bring your British Accredited Registry union card to the table and I’ll put up my united States citizenship. My evidence will secure MY place as a citizen of the united States of America, and expose that seller of this bill of lies, as a foreign citizen requiring registration with the united States Department of State for a temporary visitation visa. Best Evidence Rules will apply.)
The People need read the included link statements from these Law Departments, exposing the intentions of the foreign agents so spoken of in the Titles of Nobility Act, before these statements are changed.
The part about the ‘People’ get no service from these Law Departments should be a BIG CLUE as to what these government foreign agents intend for the ‘People’ that let them say in power.
If the American People don’t accept the gift of the Titles Of Nobility Act, so graciously given by our former Leaders from past generations, We The People can plan on exercising OUR duties as found in OUR Declaration of Independence.
OUR Founding Fathers dissolved the political bands to the British Monarchy, making the separation for the simple reason Government is Instituted among Men, deriving power from the consent of the governed. Then, by the Right of the People, instituted a new Government to most likely affect their Safety and Happiness.
OUR Founding Fathers stated, Government long established should not be changed for light and transient purposes, while recognizing mankind will suffer evil long before abolishing forms to
which they are accustomed.
OUR Founding Fathers additionally stated when long trains of abuses and usurpation caused absolute Despotism (the exercise of absolute power), OUR Right and Duty is to throw off that Government.
Our necessity to alter OUR current form of government is upon us now. The distinct branches of the Government Instituted by our Founding Fathers have become tangled to the point The People can no longer identify differences between the branches other than in name alone. When a Government assumes The People are Safe and Happy, The People need to expect the Government is not.
Without any one of ‘We The People’ seeing it coming, the members of the British Accredited Registry took the first paragraph of ‘OUR’ Declaration of Independence and quietly attempted to follow it’s teachings word for word.
The last sentence of the Declaration of Independence is the Mission Statement of every united State Law Department I’ve investigated.
And it is Hidden In Plain Sight….
Jim Porter
Ridgway, Colorado


From: Arnie Rosner <>

To: Jim Porter <>

Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2014 12:54 AM

Subject: Re: Motivation for Judicial Corruption……

In a republic form of government the three branches are all present as the way to maintain the balance of power. in a case where all three branches of government are not clearly evident and functional, do you have a Republic form of government?


<Voila_Capture 2014-11-17_09-07-18_AM.jpg>

American Civil Flag – at Peace since 1874

The truth,,,,takes so few words to express!
Available 24/7 -


On Nov 21, 2014, at 10:39 PM, Jim Porter <> wrote:


The commissioners have titles for their roles, which are rotated annually. I haven’t thought about looking into the the rolls as per
the executive
legislative and
The titles are chairman, vice chairman and commissioner.


From: Arnie Rosner <>

To: Jim Porter <>

Sent: Friday, November 21, 2014 8:31 PM

Subject: Re: Motivation for Judicial Corruption……


the executive
legislative and
Can you identify who fulfills these roles?


<Voila_Capture 2014-11-17_09-07-18_AM.jpg>

American Civil Flag – at Peace since 1874

The truth,,,,takes so few words to express!
Available 24/7 -

On Nov 21, 2014, at 5:00 PM, Jim Porter <> wrote:


I thought I knew the organizational structure, as per the flow chart I refer to when looking for department information. I’m familiar with the branches and try to keep up with the individuals working in the different offices. The judiciary is the branch that changes often.
As for your question, is it in reference to the board of county commissioners?

From: Arnie Rosner <>

To: Jim Porter <>

Sent: Friday, November 21, 2014 4:53 PM

Subject: Re: Motivation for Judicial Corruption……


Are you aware of the organizational structure of your county commission? We are speaking of the branches of government…the executive, legislative and the judicial.


<Voila_Capture 2014-11-17_09-07-18_AM.jpg>

American Civil Flag – at Peace since 1874

The truth,,,,takes so few words to express!
Available 24/7 -

On Nov 21, 2014, at 12:38 PM, Jim Porter <> wrote:


I’m not one to assign home work to busy people, but these two videos tie Judicial Corruption to the money as in follow the trail of money through corporate liability.
Judicial Corruption is being uncovered at all levels of American Government, being committed by thousands of government employees, in every united State in America.
I have discovered it in Montrose City and Montrose County Colorado,
Steve C. has it exposed in Mesa County Colorado,
Dave C. has it exposed in His Town, Colorado,
Carl has it exposed in His Town, Georgia,
Joe can find it in His Town, Texas
Sierra Pacific has exposed it in Some Town, California,
and there are Terry, Fitzpatrick and Due to name a few others.
Please, sit down and have a sandwich and take the time to watch these videos.
Let me know what you think.
Then for desert, take a read through this. We can learn the answers to our problems from these people.
Jim porter
Posted in Administration Corruption, Congressional Corruption, Corruption | Leave a comment

Shockingly heavy-handed move by the government revealed in a brand-new filing

BREAKING: DOJ Moves to Disqualify All Defense Attorneys Who Know of Govt Misconduct

Shockingly heavy-handed move by the government revealed in a brand-new filing

Related: Judge Calls Abuses ‘Egregious,’ ‘Pervasive,” and “Reprehensible”

Judge William Shubb

Judge William Shubb will hear the government’s motion to disqualify all defense attorneys for Sierra Pacific.

EXCLUSIVE: Those who dared expose government corruption in the Moonlight Fire case have just been met with a furious motion to disqualify all counsel and everyone who has even read the affidavit of former Assistant United States Attorney E. Robert Wright.

David Shelledy, Civil Division Chief for the United States Attorney’s Office in the Eastern District of California and new counsel to the case, Matthew Segal, have moved to disqualify all of the defense attorneys for Sierra Pacific and related defendants in the now infamous “Moonlight Fire” case. Ironically, Mr. Shelledy himself is the one who should be disqualified—from representing the government—if not disbarred. Mr. Shelledy is squarely implicated in the unethical and possibly criminal government misconduct he seeks to hide.

The Department of Justice through the United States Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of California extracted a $55 Million settlement from Sierra Pacific following a massive civil prosecution blaming the timber company for a wildfire that destroyed thousands of acres of forest land. The agreement also required Sierra Pacific to give the government 22,500 acres of land.

Sierra Pacific, which has always maintained it did not start the fire, was complying with the federal settlement while also dealing with litigation against it in the California state courts. In the state case, California Judge Leslie Nichols entered a blistering order in February, awarding $32 million in attorneys’ fees to Sierra Pacific and imposed the ultimate sanction—termination of the case. He found that the state agency, Cal Fire, “withheld some documents, destroyed other evidence and ‘engaged in a systematic campaign of misdirection with the purpose of recovering money’ from Sierra Pacific.”

Judge Nichols’ fiery order caught the attention of former Assistant United States Attorney E. Robert Wright, who felt compelled to come forward. Turns out that Mr. Wright had been the lead Assistant United States Attorney and filed the case against Sierra Pacific—until his superior, Civil Division head David Shelledy removed him from the case after they had a dispute about a clear ethical rule that requires the government to disclose evidence adverse to the government’s case to the defense attorneys in another fire case.

(Photo by David McNew/Getty Images)

The government stands accused of egregious misconduct in its prosecution of Sierra Pacific in the ‘Moonlight Fire’ case. (Photo by David McNew/Getty Images)

Mr. Wright blew the whistle to the Sierra Pacific attorneys, revealing serious concerns of government misconduct. Meanwhile, the defense uncovered other evidence as well, and Sierra Pacific filed a significant motion to set aside the federal settlement agreement for misconduct by the government attorneys that amounts to fraud on the court. The Defendants’ motion exposes misconduct so significant, buttressed also by decisions of a California judge, that it fueled a massive recusal of federal judges because of serious allegations of fraud on the court. Judge Mueller, who had the case originally, had already recused herself.

One judge, however, saw no need to recuse. Senior District Judge William Shubb, himself a former United States Attorney for the Eastern District of California, now has the case on his docket. He ordered a status report from the parties, to be filed yesterday, and he’s scheduled a hearing for Monday, November 24 in Sacramento. That hearing should be lively, to say the least.

Mr. Segal and Mr. Shelledy are not only seeking to disqualify all of the attorneys for all of the defendants, but also to wipe out the Defendants’ filings. Notably, the government does not deny any of the Defendants’ allegations, at least not now. They want to do that in a secret filing. Instead, the government contends that the Defendants have “engaged in egregious professional misconduct.” Pointing to Defendants’ prior efforts to talk to government witnesses in violation of a court order, the Department of Justice casts aspersions on defense counsel and attacks former Assistant United States Attorney Wright for breaching his duties of loyalty and confidentiality to his former client—the United States. Apparently the Department of Justice wants the right to commit crimes itself in complete secrecy and believes its brotherhood must protect its own at all costs.

The government demands the return of the Wright Declaration and all documents underlying it. It asks the court to strike Defendants’ motion to set aside the fraudulent settlement, requests denial of all discovery, and accuses the Defendants of fraud on the court—claiming that the Defendants did not really intend to settle the case, even though the Defendants have already paid the government millions of dollars.

The government fails to acknowledge any wrongdoing, despite the details in Mr. Wright’s declaration, and also shifts all blame the Defendants. When will they ever learn?

Not only does the government seek the disqualification of every lawyer for the defendants, but it wants to foreclose representation by anyone who has even read Wright’s declaration. That would include much of the public now and untold members of the bar, as we linked to the declaration in our original article on the recusal order, and it is posted on various websites.

As the Supreme Court has said, “the government is not an ordinary party to a controversy.” The job of an Assistant United States Attorney is to seek justice. The rules do not allow the government to suppress evidence in the face of a valid discovery request. The Professional Responsibility Office of the Department itself had instructed Mr. Wright to produce the adverse information to the defendants in the prior fire case—the ethical situation that so annoyed Mr. Shelledy originally.

Mr. Shelledy’s and Mr. Segal’s aspersions, threats against the defense, and unethical tactics could and should backfire completely. Their primary accomplishment to date is to foment further distrust of the government. Mr. Shelledy’s only ethical response would have been to withdraw from the case himself, request the appointment of a disinterested representative of the government from another office, and allow someone independent to conduct a thorough investigation of the alleged wrongs by government counsel.

Perhaps Judge Shubb, like Judge Emmet G. Sullivan and others who are fed up with our government officials lying and covering up their abuses, will see through the government’s smoke and disqualify Mr. Shelledy and the rest of the United States Attorneys’ Office. They are the ones who appear infected with corruption and deceit.

Sidney Powell worked in the Department of Justice for 10 years and was lead counsel in more than 500 federal appeals. She is the author of Licensed to Lie: Exposing Corruption in the Department of Justice.

Posted in Administration Corruption, Civil Rights Violations, Congressional Corruption, Constituion, Judicial Corruption, Obama Corruption | Leave a comment

Judge Calls Abuses ‘Egregious,’ ‘Pervasive,” and “Reprehensible”

National Politics

Fed Up With Govt Misconduct, Federal Judge Takes Nuclear Option

Federal Prosecutor Alleges Boss Pressured Him To Engage in ‘Unethical Conduct’; Judge Calls Abuses ‘Egregious,’ ‘Pervasive,” and “Reprehensible”

Judge Morrison C. England Jr.

Judge Morrison C. England Jr. ordered the entire judiciary recused from a case another judge called “egregious” and “reprehensible”

In perhaps the most stunning documentation yet of abuses by Eric Holder’s Justice Department, two former Assistant United States Attorneys spoke to defense attorneys and revealed appalling deceit and corruption of justice. This latest litigation time bomb has exploded from multi-million dollar litigation originally brought by the Department of Justice against Sierra Pacific based on allegations that the lumber company and related defendants were responsible for a wildfire that destroyed 65,000 acres in California.

In what was dubbed the “Moonlight Fire” case, the tables are now turned. The defendants have discovered new evidence and filed a stunning motion. The new evidence and disclosures are being taken seriously by the Chief Judge of the Eastern District of California—as they should be. In a shocking action, Judge Morrison C. England Jr. ordered the recusal of every federal judge in the Eastern District of California.

Sierra Pacific Industries and other defendants were compelled to pay $55 million to the United States over a period of five years and transfer 22,500 acres of land to settle massive litigation brought against them by the United States alleging that they caused a 2007 fire that destroyed 65,000 acres in California. Sierra Pacific has always maintained that the fire started elsewhere and that the state and federal investigators and Department attorneys lied. Now that settlement may go up in smoke because of the new evidence of outrageous misconduct by the federal prosecutors and the investigators from state and federal offices, as well as findings earlier this year by a state judge.

In an extraordinary development, Judge England, Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, ordered the recusal of all the Eastern District judges from the case because of serious allegations that the Court itself was defrauded by the government in the original prosecution. To avoid any appearance of partiality, he has referred the case to Ninth Circuit Chief Judge Alex Kozinski to appoint a judge from outside the Eastern District to handle the case going forward. Judge Kozinski has excoriated prosecutors for failing to meet their legal and ethical obligations.

The order notes that the defendants filed an action this week to set aside the $55 million settlement because, as the defendants allege, “the United States presented false evidence to the Defendants and the Court; advanced arguments to the Court premised on that false evidence; or, for which material evidence had been withheld, and obtaining court rulings based thereon; prepared key Moonlight Fire investigators for depositions, and allowed them to repeatedly give false testimony about the most important aspects of their investigation; and failed to disclose the facts and circumstances associated with the Moonlight Fire lead investigator’s direct financial interest in the outcome of the investigation arising from an illegal bank account that has since been exposed and terminated.”

The Sacramento Bee reported on the Defendant’s filing. Indeed, the Defendants’ motion informs us that a former Assistant United States Attorney came forward and disclosed that he believes that he was removed from the original prosecution by “his boss, David Shelledy, chief of the civil division in the United States Attorney’s office,” because he “rebuffed” pressure to “engage in unethical conduct as a lawyer.” Of course, like other former prosecutors who were unethical, Mr. Shelledy is to receive Attorney General Holder’s highest award for excellence—this week.

The defendants also reveal that another former federal prosecutor, Eric Overby, left the Moonlight Fire prosecution team also, stating: “It’s called the Department of Justice. It’s not called the Department of Revenue.” According to the motion, Mr. Overby told defense counsel that in his entire career, “I’ve never seen anything like this. Never.”

Well, sadly we have, and we’ve been reporting on it as fast as we can. This is part of a disturbing and rapidly increasing pattern of abuses by this Department of Justice to line government coffers or redistribute the wealth to its political allies—using its overwhelming litigation might and federal agencies as a tool of extortion and wealth redistribution.

The entire original prosecution against Sierra Pacific appears to have been driven by the Department of Justice’s interest in hitting a “deep pocket” for millions of dollars of revenue. The Defendants’ motion to set aside the settlement reveals a series of fraudulent acts by federal and state authorities that defiles our system of justice.

Dick Beckler, an attorney for the company who used to be at DOJ and is now with Bracewell Giuliani, told the Observer, “Sierra Pacific is looking forward to having its day in court and proving all the facts of the government’s fraud on the court.”

A California state judge, Leslie C. Nichols, in a related state case issued orders earlier this year describing what he called “egregious,” “pervasive,” and “reprehensible” abuses in the investigation and prosecution amounting to “government corruption.” He found the state case to “betray the primary purpose of the judicial system—to reveal the truth.” He awarded $32 million in fees and expenses to the Defendants, finding as the Sacramento Bee reports, that the state agency, Cal Fire, “withheld some documents, destroyed other evidence and ‘engaged in a systematic campaign of misdirection with the purpose of recovering money’ from Sierra Pacific.”

It’s encouraging to see Judge England join Judge Emmet G. Sullivan and Judge Bates, and others, as our Article III judges begin to demand that federal attorneys and agents follow the law and their oaths of office. But there remains a lot more work to do. It’s way past time to hold Holder accountable.

When will the next litigation time bomb and scandal explode on Mr. Holder and this administration? He can’t run fast enough.

This story has been updated to add comment from Sierra Pacific’s attorney.

Posted in Administration Corruption, Judicial Corruption | Leave a comment

Judge warns Arpaio with contempt, more investigation

Judge warns Arpaio with contempt, more investigation

Sean Holstege and Megan Cassidy, The Republic | 5:59 p.m. MST November 20, 2014

The federal judge presiding over a long-standing civil-rights lawsuit against the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office warned the agency during a routine hearing on Thursday that he has run out of patience and could order more action.

U.S. District Court Judge G. Murray Snow told attorneys for Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio he is inclined to cite the agency for contempt of court and to issue a court order for new investigations into how it treated Latinos and the degree to which the county’s lawmen buried evidence of it.

The case, filed in 2007, had appeared to be in the final stages after the court appointed a monitor to oversee the sheriff’s efforts to reform its discriminatory policing of Latinos during traffic stops. Snow complained of foot-dragging in May and attacked the progress again this week.

“There is ample evidence,” Snow told county officials and their lawyers, “at least some people at MCSO are abusing this process.”

His remarks came before the county’s private attorney, Timothy Casey, disclosed that new evidence was uncovered as recently as this month and that plaintiffs’ attorneys in the class-action suit still haven’t seen much of it.

“There is a substantial volume of material. It will be an undertaking,” Casey said when asked if it could be turned over.

Casey reported that, in pursuing its internal investigation of possible policy violations, the agency uncovered audio and video tapes from interviews of human smuggling suspects taken between 2009 and 2011. That and other materials – such as Miranda cards and cellphones – were linked to investigations and marked with crime report numbers, but never catalogued into evidence, he said.

Also, he said, deputies opened a locker on Sheriff’s Office premises Nov. 5 and found two purses with cellphones, keys, ID cards and indications that they, too, were related to a case file.

Then, five days later, deputies were cleaning departmental offices and uncovered 164 ID cards, mainly bearing Hispanic last names and issued in foreign countries. Deputies told investigators 111 of them were used for “training,” while no explanation was offered for the remainder.

Then, Casey, said, deputies found 35 license plates, which were supposed to have been indexed as evidence and returned to the state’s Motor Vehicle Division. Of these, 13 were linked by computer files to Deputy Ramon “Charlie” Armandariz, who testified in the civil rights trial and was suspected of targeting Latinos illegally during traffic stops.

Unlike evidence taken from his house after he committed suicide, the new evidence was found at the Sheriff”s Office.

Judge Snow had clearly reached his limit on Thursday.

He told attorneys he will issue an order telling MCSO to spell out what it plans to continue investigating internally. Anything else, he said, could be investigated by himself or by the court-appointed monitor, Snow signaled. He plans to hold a hearing on Dec. 4 into the proposed order and to call deputies as witnesses as part of his own independent inquiries, he said.

“I have given your client opportunity after opportunity after opportunity,” Snow said. “In opportunity after opportunity after opportunity, your client has violated the law, violated my express orders or subverted the investigation I ordered.”

Snow said he had the right, and maybe the inclination, to cite MCSO with civil or criminal contempt of court.

“I am not going to be tolerant any more,” he warned.

Casey, who was in court asking to be removed from the case, said he disagreed with Snow’s characterization.

“Despite some of the things that have been said here, my clients’ belief is that they have followed this court’s orders in good faith,” he said.

Last year, Snow found that the agency had racially profiled Latinos during its patrol operations and later ordered sweeping reforms to prevent discriminatory policing in the future.

Snow ordered multi-million dollar reforms, including in-vehicle recording devices, bias-free training for deputies, increased data collection and a court-appointed monitor to oversee the agency’s compliance.

But his initial reforms expanded this spring following revelations that Armendariz had been stashing drugs, identification cards, license plates and torn-up citations in his home, signaling what appeared to be a shake-down operation that stretched for years.

Armendariz also secretly recorded thousands of his own traffic stops, documenting his own misconduct and signaling to Snow that the Sheriff’s Office did not turn over all of the traffic-stop data that was required for the lawsuit.

Complicating the issue was Armendariz himself — he was one of a handful of deputies to testify during the trial.

Snow soon extended his purview to include the agency’s internal investigation into Armendariz and the possibility of widespread corruption within MCSO’s Human Smuggling Unit.

Snow has become increasingly agitated over the investigation in recent hearings.

Sheriff’s officials poured thousands of man hours into inquiry, but court-appointed monitor Robert Warshaw deemed the investigation insufficient.

The monitoring team described a lax inquiry into which deputies also employed recording devices and said investigators disregarded another former deputy’s allegations that HSU members had pocketed evidence.

Posted in Administration Corruption, Civil Rights Violations, Congressional Corruption, Constituion, Corruption, News | Leave a comment

Sheriff Joe Arpaio sues Obama over immigration executive order

On Nov 21, 2014, at 12:00 AM, wrote:

Sheriff Joe Arpaio sues Obama over immigration executive order

Sheriff Joe Arpaio sues Obama over immigration executive order

By George Miller The executive orders were just announced and lawsuits are already flying. First one out of the gate seems…

George Miller
—–Original Message—–

From: Freedom Watch <>

To: microcapmaven <>

Sent: Thu, Nov 20, 2014 9:55 pm

Subject: Sheriff Joe Arpaio sues Obama over immigration executive order

<twitter[2].png> Follow us on Twitter
Sheriff Joe Arpaio sues Obama over immigration executive order
(Washington, D.C., November 20, 2014) Today, in response to the executive order President Barack Obama has signed effectively granting amnesty to about a half of the illegal aliens currently in this country, Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County, Arizona filed a lawsuit to enjoin this unconstitutional act. This lawsuit can be found at
Sheriff Arpaio’s lawyer is Larry Klayman of Freedom Watch, former federal prosecutor and founder of both Judicial Watch and Freedom Watch. Mr. Klayman recently succeeded in obtaining a preliminary injunction against the National Security Agency for having unconstitutionally accessed the telephonic metadata of nearly all American citizens. See Klayman v. Obama, et al (Civil Action No. 13-cv-851), filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.  
Upon filing the complaint, which is styled Arpaio v. Obama, et al. before the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (Civil Action No. 14-cv-1966), Sheriff Arpaio issued this statement:
“This unconstitutional act by the President will have a serious detrimental impact on my caring out the duties and responsibilities for which I am encharged as Sheriff. Specifically, it will severely strain our resources, both in manpower and financially, necessary to protect the citizens I was elected to serve. For instance, among the many negative affects of this executive order, will be the increased release of criminal aliens back onto streets of Maricopa County, Arizona, and the rest of the nation.
I am not seeking to myself enforce the immigration laws as this is the province of the federal government. Rather, I am seeking to have the President and the other defendants obey the U.S. Constitution, which prevents this executive order from having been issued in the first place. This unconstitutional act must be enjoined by a court of law on behalf of not just myself, but all of the American people.”
For more information or an interview, contact or call (424) 274-2579.
Posted in Administration Corruption, Common Law, Congressional Corruption, Constituion, Corruption, Critical to the Republic | Leave a comment